The Politically Incorrect St. Peter
At Mass for
the Friday within the Octave of Easter, the first reading from the Acts of the
Apostles describes Peter making some incredibly bold statements which would
make any religious or cultural relativist blush. Having just cured a crippled
man at the Temple gate by invoking Jesus’ name, Peter stands before the elders,
scribes and high priests and testifies that “it was in the name of Jesus Christ
the Nazarene whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead; in his name
this man stands before you healed. He is the stone rejected by you, the
builders, which has become the cornerstone. There is no salvation through
anyone else, nor is there any other name under heaven given to the human race
by which we are to be saved” (Acts 4:10-12, italics mine). After being struck by Peter’s
boldness in speech, I laughed to myself and imagined Peter making that same
profession of faith in front of Congress, on a popular talk show or on a
mainstream news interview. Imagine the op-eds that would be written or the
Twitter posts and hashtags that would be shared (#bigot, #offended)! If Peter
were invited to speak at a college campus to share this message, would be there
student riots to impede his speaking? Now I confess that I am poking fun at
certain tenets within contemporary Western culture that balk at universal truth
claims, but in all fairness, Peter’s confession of Jesus Christ’s unique
position as the Savior, not just “a” savior, has been uncomfortable from the
beginning.
It should also be noted that
this confession of Peter is not just the strange position of one peculiarly “unenlightened”
Christian, but it is the confession of Christian faith itself. Before he makes
this claim, the author of Acts describes Peter as “filled with the Holy Spirit”
(v. 8), so the Holy Spirit, God Himself, is leading Peter to speak these things
about Jesus. Even as the Church affirms her respect of all that is true and
good in other religions (Declaration on the Relationship of the Church to Non-Christian Religions) and as she upholds the rights of individuals and
groups to religious liberty and protection from coercion (Declaration on Religious Liberty), she “proclaims and must ever proclaim Christ, ‘the way, the
truth and the life’ (John 14:6), in whom men find the fullness of religious
life, and in whom God has reconciled all things to Himself (cf. 2 Cor. 5:18-19)
(Nostra Aetate 2).
Imagining Peter causing a huge
social media scene with his affirmation of Jesus Christ as the unique Savior
and Lord of humanity made me wonder: what would happen if the Church really led
with this powerful, uncomfortable proclamation? What if you, me and other
individual Christians really shared this truth, confidently but charitably,
with those closest to us, especially our family and friends? I know by nature I
am inclined to stay comfortable, not rock the boat and speak in pleasantries
that almost everyone can agree on, but by grace I am called (and so are you) to
proclaim that the One who was crucified and raised from the dead is the Lord of
ALL, the King of ALL and the One through Whom ALL things were made and for Whom
ALL things were made. What would happen if we proclaimed this with Peter’s
boldness? My guess is that we would be thrust into the greatest adventure of
our lives with these marching orders: “Go and announce the Gospel of the Lord.”

Comments
Post a Comment